From our earliest childhood we are taught that lying is bad, very bad. All parents would crush phrases as you tell the truth always "or" bad lie ", phrases that are ultimately in themselves, lies.
Because like it or not, every society establishes a belief system beyond its empirical veracity, are accepted as true social (eg, religions). And apart from moral considerations that may sound very nice on paper, in everyday life we \u200b\u200bdeal with levels of truth (or lie, as the point of view).
In fact, young children are the ones who apply the teachings of fathers to the letter. And it is said to be innocent, because you do not learn that there are things that silence is preferable in certain moments. Which is a nice way of saying that have not yet learned to lie. And this is because we are social beings, and all social interaction involves a greater or lesser extent, lie. Otherwise we get angry all the time and the whole world.
Psychology tells us that the ability to lie is a sign of intelligence. So you do the currency and Congress are full of geniuses.
I am struck by the contradiction vital that involves trying to live with the truth in front, in a society that is largely based on consensus lies. And with that I'm not claiming to be a true type (liar would deny my lies) or criticizing the mendacity surrounding just pose the question: If we recognize the lies that underpin much of our lives together how to draw the line? What is the point of balance?
Of course there are situations in which a lie can not break out, as when a woman becomes more tricky question of the universe: Do I look fat? But that's another topic
jajajaja PD: I think those who never finish a sentence saying "...¡ indeed! " Could it be that the rest of the time lying?
Now turn your lie more accurate (animus irónicus)
Update: For the "square", not advocating moral relativism (what episcopal that phrase!). What I seek criterion is to see that everyone used to draw the line between lies "acceptable" and others. From his heart to the true nature of coexistence.
Iron Maiden - No more lies
Because like it or not, every society establishes a belief system beyond its empirical veracity, are accepted as true social (eg, religions). And apart from moral considerations that may sound very nice on paper, in everyday life we \u200b\u200bdeal with levels of truth (or lie, as the point of view).
In fact, young children are the ones who apply the teachings of fathers to the letter. And it is said to be innocent, because you do not learn that there are things that silence is preferable in certain moments. Which is a nice way of saying that have not yet learned to lie. And this is because we are social beings, and all social interaction involves a greater or lesser extent, lie. Otherwise we get angry all the time and the whole world.
Psychology tells us that the ability to lie is a sign of intelligence. So you do the currency and Congress are full of geniuses.
I am struck by the contradiction vital that involves trying to live with the truth in front, in a society that is largely based on consensus lies. And with that I'm not claiming to be a true type (liar would deny my lies) or criticizing the mendacity surrounding just pose the question: If we recognize the lies that underpin much of our lives together how to draw the line? What is the point of balance?
Of course there are situations in which a lie can not break out, as when a woman becomes more tricky question of the universe: Do I look fat? But that's another topic
jajajaja PD: I think those who never finish a sentence saying "...¡ indeed! " Could it be that the rest of the time lying?
Now turn your lie more accurate (animus irónicus)
Update: For the "square", not advocating moral relativism (what episcopal that phrase!). What I seek criterion is to see that everyone used to draw the line between lies "acceptable" and others. From his heart to the true nature of coexistence.
Iron Maiden - No more lies
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> 
0 comments:
Post a Comment