The bombs are flying everywhere digital.
SCD in a corner and his "promise of agreement" with the government.
In the other corner, consumers, but do you really have to be?
Please to comment BEFORE reading this.
Fair treatment
artists Pledge Agreement between the SCD and the Ministry of Culture
Fair treatment for all users
is true that in Chile there is a high piracy of any kind (music, programs, games, etc). But I think that this is not enough reason to just pay for the sinners. If successful the "agreement" before the law all those who have internet access will be de facto criminals, or at least potential. And that in my opinion would be an aberration from every point of view. Considering further measures to raise the agreement unconscionable. Artists
support the idea that artists seek fair recompense for the fruits of their creativity and to demand a legal framework to protect such rights. SCD
I think super
valid defend the rights of their members but I think that the lack of transparency in the act makes it a disservice to the artists. As is the idea that they are trying to get a law between cocks and midnight, not to mention that overlook the rest of the country. because such a law will affect all spheres of national life, not just those related to artistic creation, but also to scientific research, academic activities, etc . And that myopia is mainly the one that bothers me, to try to impose their views on interest parceled out to all Chileans, artists or not. Government
If the government calls a desk, such as consensus or want to call Why a meeting is held with only one of the parties, without notice to the other parties? I think that the act becomes the working table in a mere smokescreen and a tease for all excluded. Will they want to do another great negotiated much like they did with Micro $ oft? Minister of Culture itself acknowledged that meeting. It is the question "Why not say at the outset that the SCD draft the main body of the law and be more transparent? Managers
As I write this, I called my friend Serginho, to say he did not touch his principal, he said in cool case. This on purpose I put a comment on Facebook Claudio Narea. We talked at length and explained my reasons for what I wrote. And how divided and myopic vision that I think has the SCD on the subject of copyright, taking into account that the scope of intellectual property law goes far beyond what it is up to the artists.
Internet Providers
I have no doubt that having to pay royalties for copyright, the ISP would pass over such costs to us users. What will make poor service and high cost, is made even more expensive.
are not my words, read, analyze and then, think.
SCD in a corner and his "promise of agreement" with the government.
In the other corner, consumers, but do you really have to be?
Please to comment BEFORE reading this.
Fair treatment
artists Pledge Agreement between the SCD and the Ministry of Culture
Fair treatment for all users
is true that in Chile there is a high piracy of any kind (music, programs, games, etc). But I think that this is not enough reason to just pay for the sinners. If successful the "agreement" before the law all those who have internet access will be de facto criminals, or at least potential. And that in my opinion would be an aberration from every point of view. Considering further measures to raise the agreement unconscionable. Artists
support the idea that artists seek fair recompense for the fruits of their creativity and to demand a legal framework to protect such rights. SCD
I think super
valid defend the rights of their members but I think that the lack of transparency in the act makes it a disservice to the artists. As is the idea that they are trying to get a law between cocks and midnight, not to mention that overlook the rest of the country. because such a law will affect all spheres of national life, not just those related to artistic creation, but also to scientific research, academic activities, etc . And that myopia is mainly the one that bothers me, to try to impose their views on interest parceled out to all Chileans, artists or not. Government
If the government calls a desk, such as consensus or want to call Why a meeting is held with only one of the parties, without notice to the other parties? I think that the act becomes the working table in a mere smokescreen and a tease for all excluded. Will they want to do another great negotiated much like they did with Micro $ oft? Minister of Culture itself acknowledged that meeting. It is the question "Why not say at the outset that the SCD draft the main body of the law and be more transparent? Managers
As I write this, I called my friend Serginho, to say he did not touch his principal, he said in cool case. This on purpose I put a comment on Facebook Claudio Narea. We talked at length and explained my reasons for what I wrote. And how divided and myopic vision that I think has the SCD on the subject of copyright, taking into account that the scope of intellectual property law goes far beyond what it is up to the artists.
Internet Providers
I have no doubt that having to pay royalties for copyright, the ISP would pass over such costs to us users. What will make poor service and high cost, is made even more expensive.
are not my words, read, analyze and then, think.
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> 
